Postgrad module distinction grade but only 79 overall score?

Exciting News: Achieving a Distinction in My First MSc Module!

Hello everyone,

I’m thrilled to share that I recently received the results for my first MSc module in Technology Management and attained a distinction! It feels fantastic to celebrate this milestone!

However, I’ve been trying to wrap my head around how my overall score of 79% translates into a distinction grade, especially since I’ve always understood that such honors typically require a minimum of 85%. Here’s a breakdown of my marks:

  • TMA01: 68% (weighted at 10%)
  • TMA02: 82% (weighted at 15%)
  • TMA03: 84% (weighted at 15%)
  • EMA: 79% (weighted at 60%)

My overall score comes to 79%, yet I’ve still achieved a distinction. It’s a wonderful surprise, but I’m curious about the grading criteria.

Has anyone else experienced something similar? I’m eager to understand how the university determines these distinctions and what factors might play a role.

I appreciate any insights you might have! Thank you!

One Reply to “Postgrad module distinction grade but only 79 overall score?”

  1. Congratulations on achieving a distinction grade in your first MSc module! That’s an impressive accomplishment, and it’s understandable that you want to dive deeper into the grading criteria and the evaluation process. Here’s some insight that might clarify your situation.

    Understanding Grading Scales

    In many postgraduate programs, grading systems can vary significantly between institutions and even between departments. While it’s common for distinction grades to be set at 70% or higher (and sometimes even at 75% or 80%), some institutions take a more holistic approach. This means they consider various factors beyond simple numeric thresholds, such as overall performance across assessments, improvement over time, and, importantly, your engagement in the module.

    Weighted Average Calculations

    From your provided scores, it appears that the weighting is a significant factor in determining the overall score (OS). Here’s a breakdown:

    • TMA01: 68% weighted at 10% contributes 6.8
    • TMA02: 82% weighted at 15% contributes 12.3
    • TMA03: 84% weighted at 15% contributes 12.6
    • EMA: 79% weighted at 60% contributes 47.4

    Calculating these:

    • Total weighted contribution = 6.8 + 12.3 + 12.6 + 47.4 = 79.1% (rounded down to 79% for the overall score)

    Here, it seems your overall work performance aligns with a distinction grade, but it’s possible the university’s policies allowed for a distinction based on the combination of high marks in the TMAs, particularly your EMA, an essential component of the module.

    Distinction Grade Criteria

    While the threshold for distinctions might generally be 85%, some institutions may have alternative criteria such as:

    • Grade Distribution: If your cohort is performing generally well, the faculty might adjust grading, allowing more students to achieve distinctions.
    • Consistency of Performance: You’ve shown significant achievement with two out of four components exceeding 80%. Your solid TMAs along with the reasonably high EMA score reflect a consistent quality of work, which might warrant a distinction.
    • Effort and Improvement: Institutions often factor in an individual’s engagement and improvement in their evaluation process, which might work in your favor.

    Practical Advice

    1. Seek Clarification: If it’s a concern, consider reaching out to your course coordinator or academic advisor for clarity on the grading policy. They can provide official context on how distinctions are awarded and reassure you of their decision.

    2. Maintain Momentum: Use this success as motivation for upcoming modules. Focus on maintaining or improving your performance, particularly on assessments with heavier weightings like the EMA.

    3. Engage with Faculty: Don’t hesitate to engage more with your tutors and course leaders; they can offer valuable insights not just about grading but also about how to navigate future assessments effectively.

    4. Networking with Peers: Connect with fellow classmates to discuss your experiences. This can expand your understanding of their perspectives on the grading system and may lead to useful tips for managing the course workload.

    In conclusion, while the distinction might seem unexpected with an overall score of 79%, it’s evident that your varied performance across all assessments highlighted your capabilities and worthiness of the grade. Celebrate your achievement, and best of luck with the rest of your MSc journey!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Related Post

When are certificates or degree classification issued in relation to module results?

When Can You Expect Your Degree Classification and Certificates After Module Results? Hello everyone, As the date for module results approaches, I find myself feeling a mix of excitement and nerves—just like many of you, I’m sure! The countdown is officially on for the 23rd, and I can’t help but wonder about the details surrounding […]

Stage 1 modules feel kind of… pointless?

The Dilemma of Stage 1 Modules: Are They Worth the Time? As I wrap up my second Stage 1 module in my History and Politics Bachelor’s program, I find myself contemplating the real value of these initial courses. The multidisciplinary nature of the curriculum has been striking—yet, for a student focused on history and politics, […]

Anyone else get this?

Experiencing the Stress of Pending Results: Seeking Insights Hello everyone! Today, I encountered a rather concerning situation that I hope some of you can relate to. Instead of receiving a conclusive result for my final module, I was greeted with an unexpected message stating that my result is still pending. As you can imagine, this […]