Schools should consider having a UFC octagon on campus. That way, when conflicts arise, students can be directed to settle their differences in the ring.
And there would be no room for lawsuits if someone gets hurt—it’d be all in good fun!
Plus, educators could adopt hockey-style rules for handling fights: let the students go at it until there’s a break, then step in to intervene.
Junior Year Course Load… Am I in over my head?? This year, I’m enrolled in all K-level courses except for Honors Chemistry. Here’s what I’m planning to take: Onramps Precalculus AP English 3 (keep in mind, English isn’t my first language and I moved to the States about a year ago) AP Chemistry or Onramps […]
AP Gov Mock Election Update: Are We in Trouble? Currently, we’re leaning blue! The undecided states are still up for grabs and will be determined tomorrow, wrapping up the results then. They’re ahead in every state except West Virginia and Montana, which are tied, while we’re leading in all the Northeast states near New Jersey. […]
A white girl faced a significant setback.
While the idea of having an octagon in schools might sound entertaining at first glance, it’s essential to consider the potential consequences. Encouraging physical fights as a way to resolve conflicts could lead to a culture of violence rather than teaching kids how to communicate and resolve their differences positively.
Instead of throwing students into an octagon, schools could focus on conflict resolution programs, teaching empathy and mediation skills. It’s important to create a safe environment where students feel supported in resolving their issues without resorting to violence. Physical altercations can lead to serious injuries and trauma, which could have long-term effects on students.
As for teachers managing fights, they should prioritize safety and de-escalation rather than waiting for a “break” in the action. There are better ways to handle conflicts that promote understanding and respect, which are crucial skills for students to develop.