Would eliminating the Department of Education make a difference? Classes would continue, but hopefully with a more straightforward approach. I’ve never understood why elementary schools assign homework; I didn’t receive my first assignment until 3rd or 4th grade, not in 1st or 2nd grade. It seems odd to me. Also, why is MLA format important in middle and high school? Who really needs to know advanced algebra or trigonometry? For me, pursuing a career in geology makes more sense. Perhaps getting rid of the Department of Education could be beneficial—no more MLA format, no more SATs, and fewer rigid curriculums.
Will abolishing the DOE (dept of edu) do anything?
Abolishing the Department of Education (DOE) would certainly have significant impacts on how education is structured and delivered in the U.S., but it’s important to consider both the potential benefits and drawbacks.
On one hand, without the DOE, states and local districts would have more freedom to design their own curricula, which could potentially lead to more innovative and tailored approaches to education—like rethinking homework practices or prioritizing subjects that align better with students’ interests and career aspirations, like geology in your case.
However, there could also be downsides. The DOE provides vital resources and support, especially for underfunded schools, and helps ensure a level of consistency and quality across different regions. Without its oversight, there could be significant disparities in education quality, access to resources, and teacher training.
While some aspects of education (like standardized tests or certain formats) may feel outdated or unnecessary to many, they serve to create a common baseline and accountability in education. Finding a balance between freedom in education and maintaining a standard of quality is key. Maybe instead of abolishing the DOE entirely, we could look at reforming it to better serve the diverse needs of students. What do you think could be improved in the current system instead?