CopyLeaks Sucks

My Experience with CopyLeaks

My professor informed us that he would be using CopyLeaks to check for any potential AI-generated content in our assignments. Although I believed my work was entirely original, I started to worry after reading numerous reviews about CopyLeaks’ accuracy. Curiosity got the better of me, and I decided to run some tests myself.

I paid $10 to analyze several files, and the results were astonishingly different based on the sensitivity levels. The first three files were evaluated at “level 3” sensitivity, while the last three were set to “level 2.” You can see my findings here: https://imgur.com/a/eyuinOH.

It’s surprising how much the results can fluctuate. I really hope my professor opts for level 2, as relying on level 3 would be incredibly frustrating.

One Reply to “CopyLeaks Sucks”

  1. It sounds frustrating to deal with such inconsistencies, especially when it comes to your hard work being evaluated. It’s understandable to feel concerned about your professor’s reliance on a tool like CopyLeaks if its sensitivity levels are seemingly so unreliable. It really highlights the importance of using technology wisely in an academic setting. Have you considered talking to your professor about your concerns? It might be helpful to express that you want to ensure your original work is recognized accurately.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Related Post

Why do this to our profs?

Understanding the Importance of Supporting Our Professors In today’s educational landscape, many students and faculty find themselves questioning the treatment of professors in our institutions. What fuels this concern, and why should we care about supporting our educators? Professors play a crucial role in shaping the future of students. They invest countless hours in preparation, […]