Is it selfish to want to be the sole president of my own club?
Back in early March, I launched a new chapter of an organization. Two weeks ago, I opened board applications, and while I was pleased to receive an application from one individual, I later learned from the organization’s email that this person has also applied to be a chapter president of the same organization!
I’m feeling really frustrated because I don’t want to share the presidency. I put a lot of effort into setting up this chapter, and it feels strange that someone else would seek the same leadership role. I’m concerned about co-presidency, especially since this applicant doesn’t communicate well, and I really believe I should lead the club since it was my idea from the start.
Am I being selfish for wanting to be the sole president of my own club? What should I do?
It’s completely understandable to feel protective of something you’ve worked hard to create, and wanting to be the sole president of your club isn’t selfish—it’s natural. Founding a club often involves a lot of time, effort, and vision, and it’s only fair to want to lead it in the direction you envision.
However, it’s also important to consider the potential benefits of collaboration. Having another person in a leadership role can bring different perspectives and skills, which might be beneficial for the club in the long run. If you’re concerned about the person’s qualifications, maybe it would help to have an open conversation with them or with the organization about your concerns.
Ultimately, it’s about finding a balance between your desire for leadership and the potential for teamwork. You could also explore the idea of defining specific roles within the leadership to ensure that both of you can contribute in a way that aligns with your strengths. Remember, it’s okay to express your feelings and preferences while also being open to compromise. Good luck!