EVERY teacher, administrator and parent reads this article. For 30 years educators taught kids how to read using “whole language” instead of phonics. Lucy Calkins and friends made over $2 billion dollars selling this garbage to educators. Now 60% of students are functionally illiterate.

Title: The Critical Shift in Reading Education: Why Phonics Matters More Than Ever

In the realm of elementary education, the debate over how children best learn to read has persisted for decades. It’s time to shed light on a significant issue that has impacted millions of students: the shift from phonics-based instruction to the “whole language” approach. This change, driven by influential figures and lucrative interests, has had lasting consequences on literacy rates nationwide.

Historically, many educators embraced a method that emphasized contextual guessing over systematic phonics instruction—known as the “whole language” approach. Over the past 30 years, this strategy gained widespread popularity, bolstered by prominent advocates like Lucy Calkins and her colleagues, who amassed over two billion dollars through educational publishing and training. Unfortunately, this approach failed to equip a majority of students with the fundamental decoding skills necessary for proficient reading.

Today, alarming statistics reveal that approximately 60% of students are functionally illiterate, unable to read at a level needed for everyday life. This educational crisis calls for urgent reevaluation of teaching methods, particularly the renewed emphasis on systematic phonics instruction, which research consistently shows as the most effective way to teach children how to read.

If you’re a parent or concerned community member, it’s essential to recognize that this isn’t simply a matter of classroom teaching. Often, the root issue lies with district administrators who, influenced by financial and ideological incentives, perpetuated ineffective teaching models without regard for student outcomes.

To better understand the background and the stakes involved, I recommend exploring a detailed investigation into the history of literacy instruction and the corporate-driven narratives that have shaped it. One such resource offers a comprehensive look at how the “sold a story” of doubless efficacy led to decades of misguided practices.

It’s encouraging to see that change is finally on the horizon. California, for example, is now embracing evidence-based phonics instruction, fulfilling long-held aspirations for better literacy education. This pivot marks the beginning of a much-needed recovery for literacy rates across the country.

For more in-depth insights, read the full article on this important shift here: [Link to calmatters.org article].

And for those interested in understanding how significant the fight over literacy methods has been, check out this investigative piece: [Link to AP M Reports feature].

Let’s advocate for effective, research-backed teaching methods that truly serve our children’s future. It’s time to prioritize literacy strategies grounded in science and evidence, not profit or ideology

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *