College Students can’t use Grammarly !?!?

Are College Students Banned from Using Grammarly? Let’s Discuss!

As an online liaison for a college, I recently came across a surprising policy that has left me scratching my head: students are prohibited from using Grammarly because it’s categorized as artificial intelligence. This revelation caught me off guard, especially since I utilized Grammarly throughout my college years without encountering any issues.

It raises an important question: Is this a policy adopted by many institutions, or is it just unique to my college? As students navigate their academic journey, writing is a crucial skill, and tools like Grammarly can provide valuable support.

Have you faced similar restrictions at your college? I’d love to hear your experiences and thoughts on this controversial topic! Let’s start a conversation about the role of AI in education and how it might be impacting our learning environments.

One Reply to “College Students can’t use Grammarly !?!?”

  1. It’s understandable to feel confused about the variation in policies regarding Grammarly and similar writing assistance tools among colleges and universities. While Grammarly is widely used as a writing aid, its classification as an AI tool has led some institutions to ban or restrict its use, particularly in contexts where academic integrity is paramount.

    Understanding Institutional Policies

    1. Defining AI Tools: Each college has its own definitions and guidelines regarding academic integrity and the use of AI. Some institutions view Grammarly as augmentative, believing it assists users in enhancing their writing skills without compromising the integrity of the work. Others see it as crossing a line into the realm of AI assistance where it could potentially provide too much help in generating content.

    2. Type of Assignment: The restrictions often depend on the nature of the assignments. Automated tools may be discouraged in essays and thesis work, where original thought and argumentation are critical. In contrast, assignments that focus more on structure and mechanics may still allow tools like Grammarly.

    3. Historical Precedence: Many colleges evolved from more traditional methods of teaching and assessment. Policies governing the use of technology in academic work may still be adapting to the rapid advancements in AI, similar to how calculators weren’t always permitted in math classes.

    Exploring Alternative Solutions

    If you’re in a position where Grammarly or similar tools are restricted, here are practical alternatives for students:

    1. Campus Writing Centers: Encourage students to utilize on-campus writing resources. Writing centers are abundant in many colleges and can provide personalized assistance. Faculty and trained writing coaches can help students improve their writing without overstepping academic honesty policies.

    2. Peer Review: Setting up peer review sessions can be invaluable. Students can exchange drafts and provide feedback to each other, which not only improves writing skills but also fosters collaboration and learning among peers.

    3. Online Resources: Websites like Purdue OWL offer guidelines and tutorials on grammar, style, and the writing process. They can serve as excellent supplemental resources.

    4. Manual Tools: While technology tends to move fast, traditional writing guides and style manuals (e.g., MLA, APA, Chicago) remain excellent references. Students can benefit from learning the foundational rules of grammar and style by consulting these resources.

    5. Writing Workshops: Hosting or attending workshops focused on writing techniques can greatly improve a student’s skills. Topics might include thesis development, citation formatting, and sentence structure, which can bolster their overall writing capabilities.

    Advocating for Change

    If your college’s policy seems overly restrictive, you might consider advocating for a review of the guidelines. Engaging in discussions with faculty and administration about the benefits of using AI tools responsibly may lead to a better understanding of their utility in modern education, provided that students are equipped with the necessary skills to use them without compromising their educational integrity.

    Conclusion

    Every college’s policy will differ, so it’s essential for students to familiarize themselves with their specific institution’s stance. While it might seem frustrating, these restrictions aim to maintain academic standards and integrity. By leveraging available resources and advocating for constructive change, students can still find ways to enhance their writing skills while adhering to their school’s values.

Leave a Reply to sacadmin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Related Post

Should I Become a Teacher?

Contemplating a Career in Education: Is Teaching Right for You? It’s been about a year since I completed my degree in English, and I’ve found myself at a crossroads. Initially, I envisioned a future as an editor or copyeditor, but reality has led me to question whether that’s the right path for me after all. […]

Ontario bans the use of phones in school. Thought?

Ontario’s New Ban on Cell Phones in Schools: A Thoughtful Evaluation The Ontario government has recently implemented a ban on the use of cell phones and various personal electronic devices within classrooms. This policy has sparked a lively discussion among educators, parents, and students alike. As someone who grew up in an era before smartphones […]

Is it possible to get all three high school equivilancies?

Exploring High School Equivalency Options: GED, HiSet, and TASC in Massachusetts If you’re considering obtaining your high school equivalency diploma in Massachusetts, you might be wondering about the options available to you. The three primary pathways are the GED, HiSet, and TASC. Each of these credentials serves as a viable alternative for those who did […]