The Challenge of Feedback in Creative Writing Education
As a third-year student pursuing a BA (Hons) in English Literature and Creative Writing at the Open University, I’ve encountered a rather perplexing situation: the absence of opportunities for submitting rough drafts. It’s a common practice in many writing programs that allows for iterative feedback, which is essential for honing one’s craft, especially in a subject as subjective and nuanced as Creative Writing.
Throughout my studies, I have followed the recommended modules sequentially—A111, A112, and A215. Yet, I find myself grappling with a significant hurdle. When reaching out to my tutors for guidance or feedback prior to submitting my assignments, I’ve been met with unexpected responses. It appears that they are not compensated for offering direct feedback, which raises questions about the support system within our courses. Even more concerning is the warning I received: that seeking feedback on drafts—whether from university staff or even trusted friends and family—could lead to penalties for plagiarism.
In my current module, there is a small allowance for sharing brief excerpts of our writing for critique, but the limit of just a paragraph leaves much to be desired. This restriction makes it challenging to receive the comprehensive feedback that is so crucial in the writing process. As a result, I’ve often felt rather isolated and have struggled to navigate the demands of my coursework with minimal guidance.
I’m curious to know if others in a similar situation share my frustrations or experience similar challenges. How do you cope with the limitations on feedback in your writing journey? Your insights could be invaluable, and together we might find some innovative ways to support each other in our creative endeavors.
I can certainly understand your frustration regarding the absence of a rough draft submission process, especially in a field as nuanced as Creative Writing. The ability to refine one’s ideas through feedback is a vital part of developing one’s craft, and it’s concerning when the institutional framework seems to hinder that process.
First, it’s important to acknowledge that many educators value the revision process as a critical component of writing. In traditional settings, writing workshops often encourage drafts and peer feedback, recognizing that writing is iterative. However, the OU’s approach may stem from a desire to encourage independent, original work while avoiding any issues related to academic integrity. Unfortunately, this could create weaknesses in support structures and inhibit creative growth, both of which are crucial in an English Literature and Creative Writing program.
Here are some practical strategies to navigate this challenge:
Create Your Own Peer Review Network: If it’s allowed, consider forming a study group with fellow students in your module. This can be incredibly helpful for sharing work and getting constructive feedback. Look for online forums or local writing groups that can facilitate honest critiques without the fear of academic repercussions.
Utilize Online Writing Communities: Platforms like Wattpad, Scribophile, or even forums like Reddit’s r/writing can provide spaces where you can share longer excerpts of your work with a wider audience. You can gain diverse perspectives that can help guide your revisions.
Feedback from Professional Services: If you’re looking for more structured feedback, there are professional editorial services that offer manuscript critiques. While this option might involve some expense, it can provide detailed insights that align with your academic goals.
Communicate Openly with Your Tutors: It might be beneficial to express your concerns in a more structured manner, perhaps through formal feedback channels or student representative meetings. This way, your experiences can be conveyed directly to decision-makers in the program who can consider adjustments to the current system.
Embrace Self-Editing Techniques: Since you’re facing limitations on getting direct feedback, honing your self-editing skills can be invaluable. Resources like “The Writing Life” by Annie Dillard emphasize the importance of self-reflection in writing. Techniques like reading your work aloud, revising after breaks to clear your mind, and using writing prompts can foster better self-assessment.
Explore Additional Resources: Seeking out supplementary resources like books on writing craft can also be beneficial. Titles such as “Bird by Bird” by Anne Lamott or “The War of Art” by Steven Pressfield offer insights that might enrich your approach to writing and revision.
While the lack of a formal rough draft submission process may seem limiting, finding ways to adapt and create your own opportunities for growth can lead to a more fulfilling educational experience. Remember that many writers face similar hurdles, and your perseverance will serve you well in the long run. Keep pushing through these challenges, and don’t hesitate to voice your needs; you’re not alone in this!