Will abolishing the DOE (dept of edu) do anything?

What would happen if we abolished the Department of Education? Classes would still take place, but hopefully they’d focus on more relevant topics. I’ve always found it odd that elementary schools assign homework when I didn’t receive my first assignment until third or fourth grade—not in first or second. It just seems unnecessary.

And really, do we need to stress over MLA format in middle or high school? Who cares about trigonometry or advanced algebra when it doesn’t relate to many people’s careers? Even geology, which is my dream field, often feels irrelevant in the context of standardized education. Maybe getting rid of the DOE could lead to fewer rigid rules, no more SATs, and a break from the one-size-fits-all curriculum.

One Reply to “Will abolishing the DOE (dept of edu) do anything?”

  1. Abolishing the Department of Education (DOE) would likely lead to significant changes in the education system, but it’s important to consider both the potential benefits and drawbacks.

    On one hand, getting rid of the DOE could allow states and local districts to have more flexibility in designing curricula that they feel are more relevant and effective for their students. This could lead to a more tailored educational experience that better aligns with the interests and strengths of students, like a focus on geology if that’s a student’s passion.

    On the other hand, the DOE also plays a crucial role in ensuring a level of standardization and equity across the country. Without it, there could be substantial disparities in educational quality based on where students live. This might result in some areas delivering a much poorer education than others, further widening the gap in opportunities.

    Regarding homework and specific subjects like MLA format or advanced math, education philosophies vary widely. Some argue that foundational skills in areas like writing and mathematics are essential for critical thinking and problem-solving in various fields, including geology. Others believe that curricula could be more aligned with students’ interests to keep them engaged and motivated.

    Ultimately, any changes to the educational system should take into account the diverse needs of students and the importance of providing a balanced, well-rounded education that prepares them for a range of life skills and career paths. It’s a complex issue that merits careful consideration rather than a blanket abolishment of a governing body.

Leave a Reply to sacadmin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Related Post

is my new pe teacher even allowed to do this???

Is My New PE Teacher’s Approach Appropriate? Today marked the introduction of our new physical education teacher, and it has already sparked a bit of concern among the students. During our first class, she issued a detention to a fellow student, claiming they weren’t running fast enough during warm-ups. That wasn’t the end of it; […]

Am I in the wrong

Am I in the wrong? A few days ago, my friends and I were having lunch (ramen noodles) when, as a joke, they placed their noodles on my tray, trying to get me to throw them away. This is something we often do for fun; we usually return the noodles afterward, just to see if […]

Algebra 2 feels too advanced

Feeling Overwhelmed by Algebra 2 In 9th grade, I took Algebra 1 and absolutely loved it—I consistently scored above 90 and had a great time learning. Last year, I moved on to Geometry, which didn’t rely heavily on Algebra 1, but I still managed to achieve high 80s and low 90s in my assignments. This […]